ED contacts Apple to get Arvind Kejriwal's iPhone while it is being held, but encounters a password issue: Report

Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, departs at Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday in New Delhi, India.

Arvind Kejriwal's Arrest: According to sources familiar with the matter, Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigators, who have been holding Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in custody for more than a week, have contacted Apple for assistance in accessing his iPhone.

According to the source, ED has formally contacted Apple, the phone's maker, in an attempt to acquire access to Kejriwal's iPhone. However, they were told that a password was necessary to get any data.

Senior authorities involved in the probe claimed that during interrogation, the Chief Minister stated that accessing his phone data and chats would offer information about the Aam Aadmi Party's (AAP) "election strategy" and pre-election alliances.

According to reports, the ED has recovered no electronic evidence from the Chief Minister's personal laptops or PCs. However, they seized four cell phones, including his. On March 21, his arrest resulted in the discovery of roughly ₹70,000 at his apartment, which was not seized. Sources informed IE that the Chief Minister had turned off his iPhone and had not divulged his password.

The Chief Minister informed the ED that he had been using the same phone for almost a year and that the device he used to create the liquor policy in 2020-2021 was no longer in his possession.

Earlier on Saturday, the ED quizzed Delhi minister Kailash Gahlot for around five hours and recorded his testimony in connection with a money-laundering inquiry into the AAP government's now-abolished excise policy.

Gahlot, 49, is an AAP politician and Najafgarh MLA who works as the minister for transport, home, and law in the Delhi government under Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has been detained in connection with the case by the federal agency.

According to reports, Gahlot was questioned about the formation of the excise policy for 2021-22 while serving in the Group of Ministers (GoM) alongside former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia and former urban development minister Satyendar Jain.

Gahlot said he was summoned by the ED for interrogation in the matter because "probably I was part of the GoM..." It (the inquiry) included all areas of the policy, and I responded to the best of my knowledge and recall," PTI said.

The excise case includes alleged corruption and money laundering in the drafting and implementation of the Delhi government's tax policy for 2021-22, which was later revoked.

Following a suggestion by Delhi Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was charged with looking into the alleged anomalies in the formulation and implementation of the liquor policy. The ED filed a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Previously, the ED seized AAP leaders Sisodia and Sanjay Singh in connection with the investigation, and they are now in judicial custody.

The Aam Aadmi Party and its officials have continually denied claims of impropriety, with Kejriwal claiming that the case was staged by the BJP-led Centre to depict AAP as corrupt.

Income Tax FY-2025: How to Switch Between New and Old Tax Regimes

Until FY 2019-20 (which concluded on March 31, 2020), there was just one tax system with four tax slabs and rates. The New Tax Regime was implemented in 2020.

Income Tax 2024-25: During the Union Budget hearings for fiscal year 2023-24, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated that the new tax structure will be implemented as the default regime. This new tax policy went into effect in 2020. The current laws provide that if taxpayers fail to disclose their choice with their employer, deductions will be handled in accordance with the New Tax Regime.

Union Finance Minister Sitharaman emphasised in her speech on Budget recommendations for Fiscal Year 2023-24 that one of the primary goals of the new income tax system is to give individuals more control over their financial management. Rather than using government incentives or punishments to compel decisions, taxpayers are given significant leeway in deciding how to spend their money. 

Nonetheless, taxpayers who choose to cling to old taxation rules have been granted flexibility by measures in Budget 2023, which allow them to switch between old and new regimes. The frequency with which such transitions occur, however, is dependent on certain forms of income.

Salaried Individual

A salaried individual has the ability to choose between the new and old tax regimes many times during the fiscal year. The new tax system provides fewer tax deductions and exemptions than the previous tax regime, which allowed for different deductions from taxable income under Chapter VI A. Section 80C is a well-known and widely applied deduction. 

Profits from business or profession

Individuals who earn a living from their company or profession, on the other hand, can only make one decision. For example, if a person with business income moves from the old to the new system in FY 2023, they will be ineligible to transfer again. Individuals with company income who opt out of the new tax regime will be unable to opt back in in the future.

How can I switch while submitting an ITR?

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) recently issued two new income tax return forms for the Assessment Year 2024-25: ITR-1 (SAHAJ) and ITR-4 (SUGAM). ITR Form 1 now contains the option to pick a tax regime. To opt out of the new tax regime, ITR 4 taxpayers (individuals with business or professional income) must complete form 10-IEA.


Previously, people had to complete Form 10-IE to select the new tax regime. However, Form 10-IE, which allowed people to opt into the new tax system, has been terminated. This amendment attempts to make the new tax regime the default setting beginning in the fiscal year 2023-24. As a result, unless people take particular steps to opt out of the new tax scheme, it will apply automatically.

Old vs. New Tax Regime

Individuals can take advantage of a variety of tax breaks and deductions under the previous tax system. Exemptions and deductions often claimed include home rent allowance (HRA), leave travel allowance (LTA), and deductions under Sections 80C, 80D, 80CCD(1b), 80CCD(2), and more.

New Tax Regime

The exclusions and deductions provided under the Old Regime do not apply to the New Regime. If the taxable income (after all deductions) under the prior regime was less than Rs 5 lakh, the person did not have to pay any tax. 

If your taxable income is less than Rs 7 lakh, the full amount would be tax-free under the new regime.

• Income up to Rs 3 lakh is tax-free.
• Income between Rs 3 lakh and Rs 6 lakh is taxed at 5%.
• Over Rs 6 lakh to Rs 9 lakh, it is 10%.
• Over Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh, it's 15%.
• Over Rs.12 lakh to Rs.15 lakh, it is 20%.
• Above Rs 15 lakh, it's 30%.

Old Tax Regime

• Income Tax Slabs (Rs) Income Tax Rates (%)
• From 0 to 2,50,000: 0%
• From 2,50,001 to 5,00,000 5%.
• From 5,000,001 to 10,000,000, 20%
• From 10,000,001 and above 30% 

In an I-T notice, Karnataka deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar claims the BJP is targeting him politically.

DK Shivakumar

NEW DELHI: DK Shivakumar, the head of the state Congress and deputy chief minister of Karnataka, has claimed to have received an income tax notice on Friday night.

The notification, Shivakumar said, related to a matter that had already been resolved.

 
In an interview with the media on the IT alerts to Congress, he revealed this.

"This is a democratic nation.

A law is in place. This type of action and direction to officials is coming from the BJP administration "Sivakumar remarked.

He declared that the NDA will be defeated by the INDIA bloc, which is why they are inciting panic among the opposition. "They are targeting the opposition, which means they are afraid of the Congress and the INDIA Alliance.

"The NDA will be vanquished by the INDIA Alliance. The BJP is aware of this vulnerability. They are aware that they won't win the election. That's why they're attempting to instill terror. I also received a notification from IT last night regarding an issue that has already been resolved," he continued.

Arvind Kejriwal News LIVE: AAP Pioneers Repeat Delhi CM's Charge on ED, Say 'His Capture is Based on As it were 4 Statements'

Arvind Kejriwal News LIVE: Keep up with real-time upgrades on the lawful procedures including Delhi Chief Serve Arvind Kejriwal and his guardianship expansions in the midst of charges related to the extract approach case and alcohol trick

Arvind Kejriwal News LIVE: Inconvenience proceeds for Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) supremo Arvind Kejriwal as a new Open Intrigued Case (PIL) has been recorded in the Delhi Tall Court looking for his expulsion from the post of Chief Serve. The appeal, recorded by Hindu Sena President, Vishnu Gupta, says that the circumstance after Kejriwal’s later capture by the Authorization Directorate (ED) in association with the cash washing case related to the affirmed extract approach trick constitutes a breach of sacred believe ordered by the Constitution.

Kejriwal’s ED guardianship was amplified till April 1 by a Delhi court on Thursday, as it held that there were “sufficient reasons”. The tall court on Thursday too rejected a comparable PIL looking for Kejriwal’s evacuation as the Chief Serve, saying there is no scope for legal obstructions, and that it is for the other wing of the government to look at the same in understanding with the law.

Gupta’s appeal, in any case, contends that beneath Article 164 of the Structure, a Chief Minister’s rejection is justified if they act in a way that undermines the run the show of law or breaches sacred believe. It charges that since Kejriwal’s capture, the government of the National Capital Domain of Delhi has fizzled to gather cabinet gatherings, subsequently disturbing the sacred system and ruining the working of administration. The core of the PIL spins around whether the Representative has the watchfulness to reject a Chief Serve in an exceptional circumstance such as capture, given the Constitution’s quiet on the matter.

ADR files a Supreme Court case in the Election Bonds case after SBI fails to provide data by March 6.

On March 7, attorney Prashant Bhushan requested an expedited hearing for a contempt case brought by ADR against the SBI for allegedly failing to comply with the Supreme Court's directive to reveal election bond data. On March 11, the matter will be heard by the Supreme Court.

SBI has asked the Supreme Court for an extension to give the Election Commission with the necessary information on electoral bonds.

On Walk 7, the Alliance for Lion's share Run the show Changes (ADR) recorded a abhor request with the Preeminent Court, citing the State Bank of India's disappointment to provide information on constituent bonds by the court-imposed due date of Walk 6.

The ADR's offer claimed that the SBI harmed the Preeminent Court's orders. The race watch canine, ADR, is the fundamental specialist in the optional bonds lawsuit.

On February 15, the Preeminent Court struck down the Appointive Bonds program. A five-judge board comprising Chief Value of India DY Chandrachud, Judges Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra issued a reliable decision.

The request recorded on Walk 7 additionally verified that, in spite of the openness of data, the SBI failed to act as instructing by the court and inquired that the SBI allow bond data.

As of Walk 6, the State Bank of India had not released information on constituent bonds encashed by political parties, in this way coming up brief to meet the Preeminent Court deadline.

According to genuine news location LiveLaw, advocate Prashant Bhushan inquired for a incite hearing on Walk 7 for ADR's disdain suit against the SBI for claimed noncompliance with the Preeminent Court's heading to reveal information of appointive bonds.

The ask states that SBI has willfully and deliberately overlooked the regulating made by the Structure Situate of this Hon'ble Court, which willfully undermines the Hon'ble Court's master in extension to nullifying individuals' rights to information.

On Walk 11, the case will be considered by the Preeminent Court, which will additionally consider the bank's inquire for an extension of time.

The Race Commission had been asked by the court to get data on appointive bonds from the SBI by Walk 6. The SBI had recorded a development with the Preeminent Court on Walk 4 to grow until June 30 the due date for divulging information on each optional bond that the political parties had recuperated. The SBI application that was submitted to the Unique Court said that the handle of planning information from one storage facility to another and recouping data from "each storage facility" was a troublesome task.

Electoral Bonds were a money related instrument that was displayed in 2017 that enabled individuals and corporate substances to namelessly give an boundless whole of cash to political parties.

Sections 80GG and 80GGB of the Wage Charge Act of 1961 allowed for charge special cases on race bonds issued by individuals or businesses.